June 2026

Monday, June 15, 2026

https://ift.tt/wP0NTS2 via /r/awards https://ift.tt/LGt2jaN<hr> https://ift.tt/wP0NTS2

Sunday, June 14, 2026

Thank you for ending this horrible war and bringing our boys back home!Thank you for spending 3 months bombing Iranians and tanking the global economy!Thank you for lying about their "nuclear program" and using this to justify atrocities against homes and hospitals in Tehran!I'm sure you gained so many things from this peace deal, such as preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, which they totally would've used to blow up the entire world. Now you can go back to sniffing Elon Musk's butt and calling the most milquetoast libbed up grandma "the leader of antifa." via /r/Hasan_Piker https://ift.tt/6WLjvBH<hr> <div class="md">Thank you for ending this horrible war and bringing our boys back home! Thank you for spending 3 months bombing Iranians and tanking the global economy! Thank you for lying about their "nuclear program" and using this to justify atrocities against homes and hospitals in Tehran! I'm sure you gained so many things from this peace deal, such as preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, which they totally would've used to blow up the entire world. Now you can go back to sniffing Elon Musk's butt and calling the most milquetoast libbed up grandma "the leader of antifa." </div>

Saturday, June 13, 2026

https://ift.tt/dsjeVov via /r/AutoNewspaper https://ift.tt/v4DpVLy<hr> https://ift.tt/dsjeVov

Friday, June 12, 2026

https://ift.tt/8TW5FRV via /r/ProgressiveHQ https://ift.tt/Mf95Czw<hr> https://ift.tt/8TW5FRV

Thursday, June 11, 2026

Iran threatens Elon Musk companies in Middle East: State media via /r/StockLaunchers https://ift.tt/vOXNYT3<hr> <div class="md"><a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/06/11/iran-threatens-elon-musks-companies-in-middle-east-iranian-state-media.html">Iran threatens Elon Musk companies in Middle East: State media</a> </div>

Wednesday, June 10, 2026

Rule 1.No Personal AttacksPosts & CommentsReported as: Violation of our No Personal Attacks policy.Democratic civil discussion and debate is encouraged here, just as it is at Mars Society conventions, but personal attacks are not welcomed or tolerated in posts.2.No Discrimination or BigotryPosts & CommentsReported as: Violation of our Non-Discrimination policy.No clear racism, sexism, xenophobia, religious intolerance, or any other forms of bigotry in posts.3.No Foul LanguagePosts & CommentsReported as: Violation of our No Foul Language policy.No language not suitable for children.4.Civil Political Debate is WelcomePosts & CommentsReported as: Violation of our Civil Political Debate policy.Political Debate is welcome, but keep it civil! No personal attacks or insults on posters or space exploration leaders such as Elon Musk, Robert Zubrin, the NASA administrator, etc.5.Stay on TopicPosts & CommentsReported as: Stay on TopicStay on the topic raised in the opening post. via /r/MarsSociety https://ift.tt/c37Ja2f<hr> <div class="md">Rule 1. No Personal Attacks Posts & Comments Reported as: Violation of our No Personal Attacks policy. Democratic civil discussion and debate is encouraged here, just as it is at Mars Society conventions, but personal attacks are not welcomed or tolerated in posts. 2. No Discrimination or Bigotry Posts & Comments Reported as: Violation of our Non-Discrimination policy. No clear racism, sexism, xenophobia, religious intolerance, or any other forms of bigotry in posts. 3. No Foul Language Posts & Comments Reported as: Violation of our No Foul Language policy. No language not suitable for children. 4. Civil Political Debate is Welcome Posts & Comments Reported as: Violation of our Civil Political Debate policy. Political Debate is welcome, but keep it civil! No personal attacks or insults on posters or space exploration leaders such as Elon Musk, Robert Zubrin, the NASA administrator, etc. 5. Stay on Topic Posts & Comments Reported as: Stay on Topic Stay on the topic raised in the opening post. </div>

Tuesday, June 9, 2026

TLDR: How do I convince a theoretical benevolent billionaire to bankroll developing HSR through smaller cities/regions they can afford to “pay off”, while benefiting the most amount of people and where do I get the resources to make this argument? TLDR2: HSR is the USA is always attempted in major metropolitan regions where it makes the most sense due to population density, it fails for the same reason, population density relationship to political issues. How should someone develop HSR routing options that balances political feasibility with long-term benefits?TLDR3: If HSR was purposefully proposed between low-mid sized cities based on political feasibility (lowest level of pushback from local government and citizens), logical rational second (HSR terminals proximity to local commuter hubs), social benefit third (current surrounding population size) What areas/routes would make sense? Have there been studies/work looking at HSR from this angle? Any recs I should go to look/read about this idea?Hey HSR,This was a thought that I had earlier today and I haven’t heard it explored before (if has been sorry). I live in the US, specifically in the DC area and I remember growing up hearing about how amazing a HSR line between DC > NYC would be, and while it made so much technical sense, it never happened. Now most of the time when I hear about HSR in the US it's proposed going from a major city to major city, DC > NYC, the Texas triangle, etc. That makes from building technical rational of building out existing infrastructure & servicing the larger population regions but this is the US. For a multitude of reasons such as NIMBY’ism, political willpower, and practical technical implementation headaches no major HSR programs have been completed to date, is it time to try another approach?So here I am thinking, if the US government/state planning is too broken/partisan that HSR can’t be attempted for the next 5-10 years through state/federal planning. What could a benevolent billionaire do to “prove” the concept so that state/local governments can replicate and build on top of it in a few years. If HSR was purposefully proposed between low-mid sized cities primarily based on political feasibility (lowest level of pushback from local government and citizens), logical rational second (HSR terminals proximity to local commuter hubs), social benefit third (current surrounding population size); What areas/routes would make sense? Have there been studies/work looking at HSR from this angle? Any recs I should go to look/read about this idea? I’m thinking of what someone like Elon Musk (I know, terrible man) was able to do to Brownsville Texas because he was rich enough and had enough political capital to “force” it. Or the Walmart family did by developing their city in Arkansas because they are headquartered there, or Bezos and Bill gates in Washington state. There are entities and people who might be able to force a “bad” idea into existence through money and political power, the question is where that would make the most amount of sense.In the DC (DMV) area there are commuter rail that go through small-mid size local “cities” in the surrounding states. Maryland Area Regional Commuter (MARC) goes to Frederick, Baltimore and other major Maryland cities, Virginia Railway Express (VRE) services multiple cities in VA and these state based rail systems subtly feed major DMV rail system WMATA.There’s historical drama with how the WMATA train system has grown/added lines in recent years and a little known fact was that a major extension (the silverline) had a lot of original planning and funding done by major companies to build out the rail infrastructure to service the Dulles (IAD) corridor in VA, because WMATA couldn't get consistent state/federal funding to plan/implement it themselves. So the companies, who were personally invested in building out that area, were more proactive due to the transport organization being kneecapped by political issues, and mostly by coincidence MD did their own extension project (purple line) that got delayed because of NIMBY’ism.As I’m writing this the idea just got more fleshed out in my head, it's my understanding that in large part, part of the reason the Tokyo subway system is profitable (contrasted to many US metros) is because the city/government owns the surrounding land/businesses and generates taxes from that, not the rail tickets themselves. In the less urbanized regions (or poorer cities). A benevolent billionaire could potentially invest in the surrounding area enough that the resulting increase in value could offset the running at a loss development of the HSR. e.g. (MD: Annapolis > Bowie > Baltimore(Amtrak & Airport connection) - Frederick > VA: Dulles(Major Airport) - Charlottesville > Roanoke (Amtrack connection)) Last point:I want to acknowledge how untasteful this idea COULD be. The US has a bad history of redlining and they destroyed minority neighborhoods to build the highway system because the land was cheap and they didn't care about the people there. I’m thinking that HSR is so "obviously" beneficial/desired that poor cities/regions could easily be convinced/brought appropriately, it's really the money-grubbing question of land in major cities that makes it “impossible”. HSR between Baltimore, Bowie, Annapolis doesn’t make sense population wise but that region is comparatively underdeveloped compared to other regions that it might be an easier political approach with the right backer that would “force” other areas in MD to do it from a prestige standpoint. I can imagine other states/regions could make a similar argument. via /r/highspeedrail https://ift.tt/S0Pc69G<hr> <div class="md">TLDR: How do I convince a theoretical benevolent billionaire to bankroll developing HSR through smaller cities/regions they can afford to “pay off”, while benefiting the most amount of people and where do I get the resources to make this argument? TLDR2: HSR is the USA is always attempted in major metropolitan regions where it makes the most sense due to population density, it fails for the same reason, population density relationship to political issues. How should someone develop HSR routing options that balances political feasibility with long-term benefits? TLDR3: If HSR was purposefully proposed between low-mid sized cities based on political feasibility (lowest level of pushback from local government and citizens), logical rational second (HSR terminals proximity to local commuter hubs), social benefit third (current surrounding population size) What areas/routes would make sense? Have there been studies/work looking at HSR from this angle? Any recs I should go to look/read about this idea? Hey HSR, This was a thought that I had earlier today and I haven’t heard it explored before (if has been sorry). I live in the US, specifically in the DC area and I remember growing up hearing about how amazing a HSR line between DC > NYC would be, and while it made so much technical sense, it never happened. Now most of the time when I hear about HSR in the US it's proposed going from a major city to major city, DC > NYC, the Texas triangle, etc. That makes from building technical rational of building out existing infrastructure & servicing the larger population regions but this is the US. For a multitude of reasons such as NIMBY’ism, political willpower, and practical technical implementation headaches no major HSR programs have been completed to date, is it time to try another approach? So here I am thinking, if the US government/state planning is too broken/partisan that HSR can’t be attempted for the next 5-10 years through state/federal planning. What could a benevolent billionaire do to “prove” the concept so that state/local governments can replicate and build on top of it in a few years. If HSR was purposefully proposed between low-mid sized cities primarily based on political feasibility (lowest level of pushback from local government and citizens), logical rational second (HSR terminals proximity to local commuter hubs), social benefit third (current surrounding population size); What areas/routes would make sense? Have there been studies/work looking at HSR from this angle? Any recs I should go to look/read about this idea? I’m thinking of what someone like Elon Musk (I know, terrible man) was able to do to Brownsville Texas because he was rich enough and had enough political capital to “force” it. <a href="https://www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org/">Or the Walmart family did by developing their city in Arkansas because they are headquartered </a>there, or Bezos and Bill gates in Washington state. There are entities and people who might be able to force a “bad” idea into existence through money and political power, the question is where that would make the most amount of sense. In the DC (DMV) area there are commuter rail that go through small-mid size local “cities” in the surrounding states. Maryland Area Regional Commuter (MARC) goes to Frederick, Baltimore and other major Maryland cities, Virginia Railway Express (VRE) services multiple cities in VA and these state based rail systems subtly feed major DMV rail system WMATA. There’s historical drama with how the WMATA train system has grown/added lines in recent years and a little known fact was that a major extension (the silverline) had a lot of original planning and funding done by major companies to build out the rail infrastructure to service the Dulles (IAD) corridor in VA, <a href="https://www.som.com/story/transformation-through-transit-the-untold-history-of-dc-metro/">because WMATA couldn't get consistent state/federal funding to plan/implement it themselves.</a> So the companies, who were personally invested in building out that area, were more proactive due to the transport organization being kneecapped by political issues, and mostly by coincidence <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/MontgomeryCountyMD/comments/1nl4x52/the_purple_line_why_arent_we_there_yet/">MD did their own extension project (purple line) that got delayed because of NIMBY’ism.</a> As I’m writing this the idea just got more fleshed out in my head, it's my understanding that in large part, part of the reason the <a href="https://worksinprogress.co/issue/why-japan-has-such-good-railways/">Tokyo subway system is profitable (contrasted to many US metros) is because the city/government owns the surrounding land/businesses and generates taxes from that, not the rail tickets themselves.</a> In the less urbanized regions (or poorer cities). A benevolent billionaire could potentially invest in the surrounding area enough that the resulting increase in value could offset the running at a loss development of the HSR. e.g. (MD: Annapolis > Bowie > Baltimore(Amtrak & Airport connection) - Frederick > VA: Dulles(Major Airport) - Charlottesville > Roanoke (Amtrack connection)) Last point: I want to acknowledge how untasteful this idea COULD be. The US has a bad history of redlining and they destroyed minority neighborhoods to build the highway system because the land was cheap and they didn't care about the people there. I’m thinking that HSR is so "obviously" beneficial/desired that poor cities/regions could easily be convinced/brought appropriately, it's really the money-grubbing question of land in major cities that makes it “impossible”. HSR between Baltimore, Bowie, Annapolis doesn’t make sense population wise but that region is comparatively underdeveloped compared to other regions that it might be an easier political approach with the right backer that would “force” other areas in MD to do it from a prestige standpoint. I can imagine other states/regions could make a similar argument. </div>

HERE IS WHAT HAPPENEDIN THE LAST 72 HOURS.A reality TV star namedSpencer Pratt ran forLos Angeles mayor.Trump endorsed him.On election night Prattwas leading.Then mail in ballotswere counted.He lost.Trump immediately posted:"Not possible for Spencer Prattto have lost after the big lead he had.3rd World Nation."━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━THEN IT ESCALATED FAST.Trump claimed California'sentire primary was rigged.The White House was askedfor evidence.NPR reached out to the White Houseasking for specific evidenceof voter fraud in California.The response did not includeany evidence. [The Times of Israel](https://ift.tt/UbLK4h0 a single piece.━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━BUT HERE IS WHERE ITGETS DANGEROUS.A federal prosecutor announcedhis office was now pursuingmultiple election fraud investigationsin California alongside the FBIfollowing Trump's claims. [Sprout Social](https://ift.tt/yzNRXh2 evidence provided.Federal investigations launched anyway.The California Attorney Generalcalled it:"Truly embarrassing. Unhinged.Wild eyed. Dangerous.Reckless. Desperate." [The Times of Israel](https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-investing-more-than-100-billion-into-independent-arms-industry-netanyahu-reveals/?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=3152b19e-c28a-4b3e-b5ba-dccb45676f4b)━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━HERE IS WHAT IS ACTUALLYHAPPENING WITH THE BALLOTS.California election officialssay the state's drawn out tallyis by design not fraud.Mail in ballots postmarkedon or before election daymust be counted even ifthey arrive days later. [Responsible Statecraft](https://ift.tt/RKsG2Y3 is the law.Written in California statute.Available to read publicly.Right now.The California Secretary of Statesaid directly:"On election night we will havea good picture of the outcomeof most contests but it willtake weeks to know the final results.This is normal." [Ripl](https://www.ripl.com/post-1/june-2026-social-media-holiday-content-calendar?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=2690c109-7a4e-46cd-ba90-6e2e50d7f45b)━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ANGLE 1 — WHO PROFITSFROM THIS NARRATIVEMany of the congressional seatsthat will decide control of Congressin November lie in the sameCentral Valley and Orange Countydistricts whose ballots takedays or weeks to tally.The races that may decidecontrol of Congress could becounted in precisely the slowway Trump reflexively calls fraud. [Substack](https://ift.tt/mJCUekx every slow count becomesfraud by definition.Every Republican lossbecomes illegitimate by default.The midterms are four months away.The narrative is already built.━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ANGLE 2 — WHO IS FUNDINGBOTH SIDESElon Musk amplified the messagearguing that the combinationof no voter ID and mail in ballotsamounts to legalized fraud. [Substack](https://ift.tt/JXa5xFH same Elon Musk whopersonally spent 277 million dollarssupporting Trump's 2024 campaign.The same Elon Musk whoruns a platform now beingused to amplify unverifiedfraud claims to 200 million followersbefore a single investigationhas found anything.On the other side:The LA County registrar saidthe vote counting livestreamis publicly available right now.Anyone can watch it in real time. [The Times of Israel](https://ift.tt/bqRUysc side has a livestream.The other side has a postand no evidence.━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ANGLE 3 — WHAT THE POLITICALCONTRACTS BEHIND THIS TELL YOUWe reported on the SAVE Actthis week.The bill requiring a passportto register to vote.A Republican senator publicly saidit was about helping Republicanswin in 2026.Now Trump is calling Californiaresults rigged with zero evidencewhile the DOJ launchesinvestigations based onhis social media posts.And Trump personally votedby mail in Floridaearlier this year.A White House spokespersonconfirmed Trump voted by mailusing a Florida addresswhile primarily livingat the White Housein Washington DC. [Ripl](https://ift.tt/mUl65RC in voting is fraud.Unless he does it.━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━Election experts are warningthis California situationis a preview of what is comingin this fall's midterms. [Council on Foreign Relations](https://ift.tt/K8WOvdN months away.The SAVE Act makes it harderto register to vote.Fraud claims delegitimizeresults before they are certified.Federal investigations launchbased on social media postswith no evidence attached.This is not three separate stories.This is one playbook.Being run right now.In real time.Before your eyes.━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━Nobody paid us to write this.The people building thisnarrative four months beforethe midterms would preferyou called it politicsand kept scrolling. INDEPENDENT SOURCES: 1. Democracy Now — Full California election fraud claim analysis: democracynow.org 2. Status Coup News — Ground level election integrity reporting: statuscoup.com 3. The Lever — Money behind midterm election fraud narrative: levernews.com 4. Bolts Magazine — California voting rules explained and fact checked: boltsmag.org 5. PopVox Foundation — Full SAVE Act and fraud narrative connection: popvox.org━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ MAINSTREAM SOURCES: 6. NPR — White House provided zero evidence confirmed: npr.org/2026/06/09/nx-s1-5850269/californias-attorney-general-on-trumps-baseless-claim-of-election-fraud 7. NBC News — DOJ launches investigations confirmed: nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/californias-slow-vote-count-trumps-unfounded-fraud-claims-midterms-rcna348978 8. TIME Magazine — California vote count explained fully: time.com/article/2026/06/07/la-mayor-results-california-election-rigged-trump 9. ABC News — Trump voted by mail himself confirmed: abcnews.com/Politics/trump-accuses-california-democrats-evidence-steal-elections/story?id=133578982 10. Philadelphia Inquirer —Midterm strategy full analysis:inquirer.com/politics/trump-california-vote-count-fraud-accusations-midterm-strategy-20260609.html via /r/PLNewsGroup https://ift.tt/u51N2UC<hr> <div class="md">HERE IS WHAT HAPPENED IN THE LAST 72 HOURS. A reality TV star named Spencer Pratt ran for Los Angeles mayor. Trump endorsed him. On election night Pratt was leading. Then mail in ballots were counted. He lost. Trump immediately posted: "Not possible for Spencer Pratt to have lost after the big lead he had. 3rd World Nation." ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ THEN IT ESCALATED FAST. Trump claimed California's entire primary was rigged. The White House was asked for evidence. NPR reached out to the White House asking for specific evidence of voter fraud in California. The response did not include any evidence. [The Times of Israel](<a href="https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-investing-more-than-100-billion-into-independent-arms-industry-netanyahu-reveals/?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=ced9dd04-48fd-4b36-85c8-1f1960af4494">https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-investing-more-than-100-billion-into-independent-arms-industry-netanyahu-reveals/?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=ced9dd04-48fd-4b36-85c8-1f1960af4494</a>) None. Not a single piece. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ BUT HERE IS WHERE IT GETS DANGEROUS. A federal prosecutor announced his office was now pursuing multiple election fraud investigations in California alongside the FBI following Trump's claims. [Sprout Social](<a href="https://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-media-trends/?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=f96bfb50-c509-4612-a43e-ce05f493450d">https://sproutsocial.com/insights/social-media-trends/?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=f96bfb50-c509-4612-a43e-ce05f493450d</a>) No evidence provided. Federal investigations launched anyway. The California Attorney General called it: "Truly embarrassing. Unhinged. Wild eyed. Dangerous. Reckless. Desperate." [The Times of Israel](<a href="https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-investing-more-than-100-billion-into-independent-arms-industry-netanyahu-reveals/?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=3152b19e-c28a-4b3e-b5ba-dccb45676f4b">https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-investing-more-than-100-billion-into-independent-arms-industry-netanyahu-reveals/?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=3152b19e-c28a-4b3e-b5ba-dccb45676f4b</a>) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ HERE IS WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING WITH THE BALLOTS. California election officials say the state's drawn out tally is by design not fraud. Mail in ballots postmarked on or before election day must be counted even if they arrive days later. [Responsible Statecraft](<a href="https://responsiblestatecraft.org/october-7-hamas-attack/?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=e2c9a9f6-8b01-44c4-ac77-094a7e7fc2b4">https://responsiblestatecraft.org/october-7-hamas-attack/?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=e2c9a9f6-8b01-44c4-ac77-094a7e7fc2b4</a>) This is the law. Written in California statute. Available to read publicly. Right now. The California Secretary of State said directly: "On election night we will have a good picture of the outcome of most contests but it will take weeks to know the final results. This is normal." [Ripl](<a href="https://www.ripl.com/post-1/june-2026-social-media-holiday-content-calendar?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=2690c109-7a4e-46cd-ba90-6e2e50d7f45b">https://www.ripl.com/post-1/june-2026-social-media-holiday-content-calendar?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=2690c109-7a4e-46cd-ba90-6e2e50d7f45b</a>) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ANGLE 1 — WHO PROFITS FROM THIS NARRATIVE Many of the congressional seats that will decide control of Congress in November lie in the same Central Valley and Orange County districts whose ballots take days or weeks to tally. The races that may decide control of Congress could be counted in precisely the slow way Trump reflexively calls fraud. [Substack](<a href="https://oliverboydbarrett.substack.com/p/geopolitics-and-imperialism-compendium?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=ca5d7e02-c36b-4794-8ca4-895d846f3b5e">https://oliverboydbarrett.substack.com/p/geopolitics-and-imperialism-compendium?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=ca5d7e02-c36b-4794-8ca4-895d846f3b5e</a>) If every slow count becomes fraud by definition. Every Republican loss becomes illegitimate by default. The midterms are four months away. The narrative is already built. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ANGLE 2 — WHO IS FUNDING BOTH SIDES Elon Musk amplified the message arguing that the combination of no voter ID and mail in ballots amounts to legalized fraud. [Substack](<a href="https://oliverboydbarrett.substack.com/p/geopolitics-and-imperialism-compendium?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=ae53022d-eac6-4081-ae8b-a60fc30997a3">https://oliverboydbarrett.substack.com/p/geopolitics-and-imperialism-compendium?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=ae53022d-eac6-4081-ae8b-a60fc30997a3</a>) The same Elon Musk who personally spent 277 million dollars supporting Trump's 2024 campaign. The same Elon Musk who runs a platform now being used to amplify unverified fraud claims to 200 million followers before a single investigation has found anything. On the other side: The LA County registrar said the vote counting livestream is publicly available right now. Anyone can watch it in real time. [The Times of Israel](<a href="https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-investing-more-than-100-billion-into-independent-arms-industry-netanyahu-reveals/?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=055a4537-ae98-4995-a48c-8b8d02a2711d">https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-investing-more-than-100-billion-into-independent-arms-industry-netanyahu-reveals/?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=055a4537-ae98-4995-a48c-8b8d02a2711d</a>) One side has a livestream. The other side has a post and no evidence. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ANGLE 3 — WHAT THE POLITICAL CONTRACTS BEHIND THIS TELL YOU We reported on the SAVE Act this week. The bill requiring a passport to register to vote. A Republican senator publicly said it was about helping Republicans win in 2026. Now Trump is calling California results rigged with zero evidence while the DOJ launches investigations based on his social media posts. And Trump personally voted by mail in Florida earlier this year. A White House spokesperson confirmed Trump voted by mail using a Florida address while primarily living at the White House in Washington DC. [Ripl](<a href="https://www.ripl.com/post-1/june-2026-social-media-holiday-content-calendar?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=fd772f39-e3fa-4b8e-8243-261da048f129">https://www.ripl.com/post-1/june-2026-social-media-holiday-content-calendar?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=fd772f39-e3fa-4b8e-8243-261da048f129</a>) Mail in voting is fraud. Unless he does it. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Election experts are warning this California situation is a preview of what is coming in this fall's midterms. [Council on Foreign Relations](<a href="https://www.cfr.org/articles/us-aid-israel-four-charts?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=b48f0137-8a49-4264-a667-a934d7b56dfb">https://www.cfr.org/articles/us-aid-israel-four-charts?claude-citation-d915fd5a-d2c6-4d1f-88ed-b76da5be2e5e=b48f0137-8a49-4264-a667-a934d7b56dfb</a>) Four months away. The SAVE Act makes it harder to register to vote. Fraud claims delegitimize results before they are certified. Federal investigations launch based on social media posts with no evidence attached. This is not three separate stories. This is one playbook. Being run right now. In real time. Before your eyes. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ Nobody paid us to write this. The people building this narrative four months before the midterms would prefer you called it politics and kept scrolling. INDEPENDENT SOURCES: 1. Democracy Now — Full California election fraud claim analysis: <a href="http://democracynow.org/">democracynow.org</a> 2. Status Coup News — Ground level election integrity reporting: <a href="http://statuscoup.com/">statuscoup.com</a> 3. The Lever — Money behind midterm election fraud narrative: <a href="http://levernews.com/">levernews.com</a> 4. Bolts Magazine — California voting rules explained and fact checked: <a href="http://boltsmag.org/">boltsmag.org</a> 5. PopVox Foundation — Full SAVE Act and fraud narrative connection: <a href="http://popvox.org/">popvox.org</a> ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ MAINSTREAM SOURCES: 6. NPR — White House provided zero evidence confirmed: <a href="http://npr.org/2026/06/09/nx-s1-5850269/californias-attorney-general-on-trumps-baseless-claim-of-election-fraud">npr.org/2026/06/09/nx-s1-5850269/californias-attorney-general-on-trumps-baseless-claim-of-election-fraud</a> 7. NBC News — DOJ launches investigations confirmed: <a href="http://nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/californias-slow-vote-count-trumps-unfounded-fraud-claims-midterms-rcna348978">nbcnews.com/politics/2026-election/californias-slow-vote-count-trumps-unfounded-fraud-claims-midterms-rcna348978</a> 8. TIME Magazine — California vote count explained fully: <a href="http://time.com/article/2026/06/07/la-mayor-results-california-election-rigged-trump">time.com/article/2026/06/07/la-mayor-results-california-election-rigged-trump</a> 9. ABC News — Trump voted by mail himself confirmed: <a href="http://abcnews.com/Politics/trump-accuses-california-democrats-evidence-steal-elections/story?id=133578982">abcnews.com/Politics/trump-accuses-california-democrats-evidence-steal-elections/story?id=133578982</a> 10. Philadelphia Inquirer — Midterm strategy full analysis: <a href="http://inquirer.com/politics/trump-california-vote-count-fraud-accusations-midterm-strategy-20260609.html">inquirer.com/politics/trump-california-vote-count-fraud-accusations-midterm-strategy-20260609.html</a> </div>

Monday, June 8, 2026

I got curious about the commodities needed for full scale, high rate Starship launches and if it was actually feasible to produce enough LOx and LNG to support the 100 launches/year that Elon dreams of. Yes, I used AI; no I don’t care what you think about that. At the end of the day, we’re talking hundreds of billions and decades of investment needed to reach an operational Starship launches cadence. Stick to the companies that have realistic goals and aren’t about to have 50% of their workforce quit because they all become overnight multi-millionaires and can retire.TL;DR:Liquid oxygen is abundant (global supply = 1,280× Starship’s demand).Liquid methane is the critical bottleneck:- Current rocket-grade supply = 1.5 million metric tons/year (0.001% of global production).- Starship’s 100-launch demand = 145,000 metric tons/year → 96× higher than current supply.- No existing plants can produce rocket-grade methane (requires 99.999% purity).→ 100 launches/year is mathematically possible but practically impossible without a $100 billion methane revolution.-------------------------THE REAL NUMBERS (Source: IEA, U.S. EIA, SpaceX Technical Documents)Global Propellant ProductionPropellant |Global Production |Rocket-Grade SupplyLiquid Oxygen (LOX) |400 million metric tons/year |99.9% usable (industrial air separation byproduct)Liquid Methane (CH₄) |150 million metric tons/year |≤0.1% rocket-grade (1.5 million metric tons/year usable) > **Key Insight**: **LOX is "free"**: Existing industrial plants produce surplus LOX (e.g., Air Products makes 45 million metric tons/year *just for rockets*).**Methane is scarce**: 99.8% of global methane is **impure industrial gas** (contaminants like H₂S and CO₂ make it unusable for Starship).Starship’s 100-Launch DemandPropellant |Per Launch |100 Launches |**% of Global Supply**LOX |5,200 metric tons |520,000 metric tons |0.13%Methane |1,450 metric tons |145,000 metric tons |0.097% -------------------------WHY METHANE IS THE REAL BOTTLENECK(Forget volume—purity and infrastructure are the killers)a) Current Rocket-Grade Methane Supply- Only 1.5 million metric tons/year exists globally (e.g., SpaceX’s Starbase facility).- Starship needs 145,000 metric tons/year → 96× more than current supply.b) Why Can’t We Just Scale Up?Problem |Reality |ConsequencePurity Requirement |Industrial methane = 95% pure |99.999% purity needed (impossible with existing technology)Infrastructure Gap |1 facility (Starbase) |Need 1,000+ new plants ($500 million each)Market Disruption |LNG powers 30% of global energy |Redirecting 145,000 metric tons/year would spike LNG prices 500%+ c) Cost Breakdown- Build 1 rocket-grade plant: $500 million+ (Starbase = $1 billion).- Build 300 plants for 100 launches: $150 billion+ (SpaceX’s 2023 internal report).- Timeline: Even with full investment → 7–10 years to reach demand (not 5 years as Musk claims).-------------------------LOX IS THE EASY PART- Global LOX supply: 400 million metric tons/year = 1,280× Starship’s demand.- Solution: Use existing plants (e.g., Linde, Air Products).- Cost: $10 per metric ton (vs. $500 per metric ton for pure rocket-grade methane).- Verdict: Achievable immediately.-------------------------METHANE IS THE CHALLENGE- No existing solution for mass-producing rocket-grade methane.- Global methane production is fully allocated to energy markets (e.g., LNG exports).- Musk’s solution? “Build 200+ new plants” → $100 billion+ investment, no timeline.- Bottom line: 145,000 metric tons/year of rocket-grade methane is theoretically possible but practically impossible without redefining global energy infrastructure.-------------------------REAL-WORLD IMPACT- LOX: SpaceX could launch 100 times more flights today with existing supply.- Methane: 100 launches/year would require 100× more rocket-grade methane plants than exist.- Musk’s claim: “100 launches/year by 2030” = mathematically optimistic but infrastructure-unrealistic.**FINAL VERDICT**:*“The 100-launch/year goal isn’t volume-limited—it’s purity-limited. Liquid oxygen is abundant; liquid methane is a systemic redesign challenge. SpaceX’s timeline is likely 2040+, not 2030.”*-------------------------**NOT A VOLUME ISSUE—IT’S PURITY, SCALABILITY, AND MARKET DISRUPTION.** via /r/RKLB https://ift.tt/VAtC9kS<hr> <div class="md">I got curious about the commodities needed for full scale, high rate Starship launches and if it was actually feasible to produce enough LOx and LNG to support the 100 launches/year that Elon dreams of. Yes, I used AI; no I don’t care what you think about that. At the end of the day, we’re talking hundreds of billions and decades of investment needed to reach an operational Starship launches cadence. Stick to the companies that have realistic goals and aren’t about to have 50% of their workforce quit because they all become overnight multi-millionaires and can retire. TL;DR: Liquid oxygen is abundant (global supply = 1,280× Starship’s demand). Liquid methane is the critical bottleneck: - Current rocket-grade supply = 1.5 million metric tons/year (0.001% of global production). - Starship’s 100-launch demand = 145,000 metric tons/year → 96× higher than current supply. - No existing plants can produce rocket-grade methane (requires 99.999% purity). → 100 launches/year is mathematically possible but practically impossible without a $100 billion methane revolution. ------------------------- THE REAL NUMBERS (Source: IEA, U.S. EIA, SpaceX Technical Documents) <ol> <li>Global Propellant Production</li> </ol> Propellant |Global Production |Rocket-Grade Supply Liquid Oxygen (LOX) |400 million metric tons/year |99.9% usable (industrial air separation byproduct) Liquid Methane (CH₄) |150 million metric tons/year |≤0.1% rocket-grade (1.5 million metric tons/year usable) > **Key Insight**: **LOX is "free"**: Existing industrial plants produce surplus LOX (e.g., Air Products makes 45 million metric tons/year *just for rockets*). **Methane is scarce**: 99.8% of global methane is **impure industrial gas** (contaminants like H₂S and CO₂ make it unusable for Starship). <ol> <li>Starship’s 100-Launch Demand</li> </ol> Propellant |Per Launch |100 Launches |**% of Global Supply** LOX |5,200 metric tons |520,000 metric tons |0.13% Methane |1,450 metric tons |145,000 metric tons |0.097% ------------------------- WHY METHANE IS THE REAL BOTTLENECK (Forget volume—purity and infrastructure are the killers) a) Current Rocket-Grade Methane Supply - Only 1.5 million metric tons/year exists globally (e.g., SpaceX’s Starbase facility). - Starship needs 145,000 metric tons/year → 96× more than current supply. b) Why Can’t We Just Scale Up? Problem |Reality |Consequence Purity Requirement |Industrial methane = 95% pure |99.999% purity needed (impossible with existing technology) Infrastructure Gap |1 facility (Starbase) |Need 1,000+ new plants ($500 million each) Market Disruption |LNG powers 30% of global energy |Redirecting 145,000 metric tons/year would spike LNG prices 500%+ c) Cost Breakdown - Build 1 rocket-grade plant: $500 million+ (Starbase = $1 billion). - Build 300 plants for 100 launches: $150 billion+ (SpaceX’s 2023 internal report). - Timeline: Even with full investment → 7–10 years to reach demand (not 5 years as Musk claims). ------------------------- LOX IS THE EASY PART - Global LOX supply: 400 million metric tons/year = 1,280× Starship’s demand. - Solution: Use existing plants (e.g., Linde, Air Products). - Cost: $10 per metric ton (vs. $500 per metric ton for pure rocket-grade methane). - Verdict: Achievable immediately. ------------------------- METHANE IS THE CHALLENGE - No existing solution for mass-producing rocket-grade methane. - Global methane production is fully allocated to energy markets (e.g., LNG exports). - Musk’s solution? “Build 200+ new plants” → $100 billion+ investment, no timeline. - Bottom line: 145,000 metric tons/year of rocket-grade methane is theoretically possible but practically impossible without redefining global energy infrastructure. ------------------------- REAL-WORLD IMPACT - LOX: SpaceX could launch 100 times more flights today with existing supply. - Methane: 100 launches/year would require 100× more rocket-grade methane plants than exist. - Musk’s claim: “100 launches/year by 2030” = mathematically optimistic but infrastructure-unrealistic. **FINAL VERDICT**: *“The 100-launch/year goal isn’t volume-limited—it’s purity-limited. Liquid oxygen is abundant; liquid methane is a systemic redesign challenge. SpaceX’s timeline is likely 2040+, not 2030.”* ------------------------- **NOT A VOLUME ISSUE—IT’S PURITY, SCALABILITY, AND MARKET DISRUPTION.** </div>

https://ift.tt/8vTxiY5 via /r/clevercomebacks https://ift.tt/ZyO4kwz<hr> https://ift.tt/8vTxiY5

Sunday, June 7, 2026

Hello everybody I am 21 years old and my networth is at around 17k (11k invested into a etf). I currently work as a software dev (since 10 months now) earn around 2.1k per month. I keep putting around 1k per month into my ETF and whenever my bank account (not my savings bank account, I have around 5k on it) reaches over 2k I invest those as well!Now my problem, how do I actually become financial free? I’m not talking about becoming the next Elon musk but what did you guys do to really become financial free and don’t care about money. When I have a family I don’t wanna be this dad who is Like sorry son I can’t get you a bike rn I need to save 3 months for it. What did you guys actually do to become a millionaire. Are there any valuable life lessons which will help me along the way? Don’t get me wrong I’m a very motivated person and I like to grind at work and like to work on myself and on my skills to have some personal growth. So I don’t expect to lay down in bed and become a millionaire, so I take every hard learning and lesson you hahe for me! Thank you very much!! via /r/wealth https://ift.tt/mWi5rTG<hr> <div class="md">Hello everybody I am 21 years old and my networth is at around 17k (11k invested into a etf). I currently work as a software dev (since 10 months now) earn around 2.1k per month. I keep putting around 1k per month into my ETF and whenever my bank account (not my savings bank account, I have around 5k on it) reaches over 2k I invest those as well! Now my problem, how do I actually become financial free? I’m not talking about becoming the next Elon musk but what did you guys do to really become financial free and don’t care about money. When I have a family I don’t wanna be this dad who is Like sorry son I can’t get you a bike rn I need to save 3 months for it. What did you guys actually do to become a millionaire. Are there any valuable life lessons which will help me along the way? Don’t get me wrong I’m a very motivated person and I like to grind at work and like to work on myself and on my skills to have some personal growth. So I don’t expect to lay down in bed and become a millionaire, so I take every hard learning and lesson you hahe for me! Thank you very much!! </div>

I've gotten a number of DMs asking about investment advice, stocks I like, or what I do for a living. I figured I'd share an important lesson that I learned, and that if I had learned it earlier it would have both made me money, and more importantly saved me from losses. For background, I am not a financial advisor. I'm a serial entrepreneur who built a million dollar company in my early twenties, lost everything, went back to school, and then took my lessons from my losses and rebuilt from the ground up. I own multiple companies now, almost all started by myself, but I have also bought and sold companies as well. I don't think school is "necessary" for success and I think you will get out of it what you put in to it, but I'm still very glad I went back regardless of whether or not it contributed to financial successes. When I was young and I would talk with friends about business and business ideas, we tended to discuss an idea, a concept, or an industry. Whoever had the best business idea, we would then talk about "doing" that idea. It never went anywhere though, and eventually I learned the first part of the "Who" lesson unintentionally. They never followed through, and I would be frustrated that it was all just talk. My success started when I just started building a business for myself. I didn't really put much thought in to it other than giving myself kudos for "doing" it. It wasn't until I rebuilt everything, had sustainable success, and was then able to invest in other things, ventures, and people that the lesson hit home. The things and people that I invested in that did poorly had NOTHING to do with the idea or the product. They were actually all great. The one common denominator with an investment going poorly was WHO I invested in or with. The wrong people will give up when it gets tough (and it ALWAYS get tough), they celebrate too early, they clock in and clock out. The right people just have that "it" in them. Je na sais quoi is a good term from French that means something along the lines of "that thing you can't quite put your finger on" (I don't speak French, but I'm close enough and if I'm not you get the meaning). The right people don't talk - they execute. They don't celebrate the lead, they celebrate the close. A 40 hour work week is part time for them. And most importantly, they do NOT have "quit" in them. When it gets tough, they dig their heels in further. They will literally do everything in their power to move the world around them instead of being moved by the world when it comes to their business. How can you apply this to stocks? I'll give you two examples of CEO's (Who's) that I've invested in and one that I got wrong by realizing it too late, and one that I got right by realizing it early. Before I get in to them though, I want to clarify one point about this lesson. This is identifying WHO is a good CEO/partner/friend, that should lead to a good investment. This is NOT identifying who is a good PERSON. I think Steve Jobs was a horrible person and incredibly unethical. I think he was a ruthless thief...but damn was he an incredible CEO. Case #1: Elon Musk and TeslaWhen I first started reading about Elon, something seemed off about him. I thought he was selling BS and I didn't want any part of it. I completely missed Tesla because of that. It wasn't until around 2017/18 that my mind started to change about him. He was being heavily shorted and he made some comment about putting a bed in that Tesla factory until he got production to where he wanted. That got my attention and so I started paying attention more to WHO he was. I know this is Reddit and most people hate him on here, but all I saw after that was someone who would stop at nothing to execute on his vision. I probably should have made a more serious investment in Tesla back in 19/20, but I thought I missed the boat. Luckily, I was able to get in Space X about a year and a half ago. I personally think Space X will explode out of the gates (they just signed a $12 Billion compute deal with Google a day or two ago), but I plan to hold long term. Love him or hate him - I think he will go down as one of the greatest operators in history and executes on plan unlike anything I have ever seen. Case #2: Nasrat Hakim and Elite PharmaceuticalsI was working on a client's deal who was heavily invested in ELTP and his shares were around 25 or 26 cents a share back in 2017. I looked at the company and it was just a hot mess. A bunch of hopium around a technology that introduced an agitant to pharmaceuticals that would burn your nose and throat if you tried to crush them while using them to get high. The technology was a good IDEA, but it didn't get FDA approval and they had almost no revenue (I think it was sub $1 million at the time.) The client didn't take the advice and I would just look at it every few months as it dropped from 25 to 20 and eventually all the way down to 3 cents. Then something amazing happened - ELTP started growing revenue and I believe they became cash flow positive around 2020 or 2021. You never really see that from a company that looks like it is on the verge of bankruptcy - especially a company on the OTC. I started reading everything I could on the C-suite. Nasrat impressed the hell out of me. An attorney first and then CEO, he made some incredibly shrewd decisions. He pulled out of all opioids during the massive litigation that was starting around the country against Purdue and other opioid companies. He changed the direction of the company from an "all or nothing" moonshot, to safe and steady generic manufacturer. Then he started negotiating deals, getting shareholders access to larger and larger revenue producing drugs. Lannet Pharma was once a $3 billion market value client of Elite's (and a hopeful buyout partner), was making a move to cut Elite out of the manufacturing side of their deal. Nasrat pivoted and hired Kirko Kirkov to develop an internal sales team. Kirkov was a brilliant acquisition. Kirkov sold more in 1 month than Lannett sold for Elite in a whole year. In another brilliant move, Nasrat sold off 3 drugs to a competitor for some much needed cash, but, at the time, no one knew the details of that full agreement. Nasrat had put a buyback clause in the agreement for the same price Elite was paid, but since he bought it back after the massive inflation post Covid, he essentially was able to buy all the drugs back for around a 25% discount. Due to all of these factors, I really believed in the "Who", and I started acquiring a massive amount of shares. This time, I was proud to have assessed the "Who" so early that I was able to buy shares at the 3 to 7 cent mark. I did have one MAJOR concern though, and it was a big one. The CFO, Carter Ward. My fear when investing in stocks as opposed to real estate deals is that I can never be 100% sure someone isn't cooking the books. This was a tiny company in a lot of trouble, and Carter left the company. That made me very concerned that what if the reason he left was because there was something he didn't like in the books? I've been in a similar situation myself during a stint as a CFO and I know from that experience that when something doesn't look good in the books, it is NOT a good feel and your goal is to get as far away as possible from problematic books. So, as Elite was going through various CFOs in the aftermath, it was making me feel worse and worse. The golden lining was the final moment for me that made me feel great about my investment. Carter Ward came back to ELTP. No CFO would come back to books that had problems in them. It was actually a better sign than if he had just stayed. Elite has a major date coming up on June 11th where the judge is pushing for an outcome on a patent dispute between ELTP and Purdue. The judge told Purdue to either work out an agreement or he would recommend Elite to file for dismissal, which I read as, "Games over. Figure it out or I'm dropping the case because Purdue doesn't even exist anymore." Closely following that date, ELTP has their annual earnings which will guaranteed be another record breaking year (they broke the record at the 9 month mark already). Top it off with the filing last week of a $26 Billion drug, which, by the estimates of one of the biggest cynics on this board, would be an approximate increase of revenues of about $600 million and ELTP is sitting pretty for an eventual buyout (they hired Jeffries about 10 months ago for M&A) or an uplisting/Spac merger.TLDR: Who you invest in matters more than what and I'm high on both Space X and ELTP and for those who haven't seen any of my prior posts, I am heavily invested in both. Long read, but hope it helps give some of you a perspective that I think is extremely important when putting your money in anything. via /r/pennystocks https://ift.tt/er0ZQP2<hr> <div class="md">I've gotten a number of DMs asking about investment advice, stocks I like, or what I do for a living. I figured I'd share an important lesson that I learned, and that if I had learned it earlier it would have both made me money, and more importantly saved me from losses. For background, I am not a financial advisor. I'm a serial entrepreneur who built a million dollar company in my early twenties, lost everything, went back to school, and then took my lessons from my losses and rebuilt from the ground up. I own multiple companies now, almost all started by myself, but I have also bought and sold companies as well. I don't think school is "necessary" for success and I think you will get out of it what you put in to it, but I'm still very glad I went back regardless of whether or not it contributed to financial successes. When I was young and I would talk with friends about business and business ideas, we tended to discuss an idea, a concept, or an industry. Whoever had the best business idea, we would then talk about "doing" that idea. It never went anywhere though, and eventually I learned the first part of the "Who" lesson unintentionally. They never followed through, and I would be frustrated that it was all just talk. My success started when I just started building a business for myself. I didn't really put much thought in to it other than giving myself kudos for "doing" it. It wasn't until I rebuilt everything, had sustainable success, and was then able to invest in other things, ventures, and people that the lesson hit home. The things and people that I invested in that did poorly had NOTHING to do with the idea or the product. They were actually all great. The one common denominator with an investment going poorly was WHO I invested in or with. The wrong people will give up when it gets tough (and it ALWAYS get tough), they celebrate too early, they clock in and clock out. The right people just have that "it" in them. Je na sais quoi is a good term from French that means something along the lines of "that thing you can't quite put your finger on" (I don't speak French, but I'm close enough and if I'm not you get the meaning). The right people don't talk - they execute. They don't celebrate the lead, they celebrate the close. A 40 hour work week is part time for them. And most importantly, they do NOT have "quit" in them. When it gets tough, they dig their heels in further. They will literally do everything in their power to move the world around them instead of being moved by the world when it comes to their business. How can you apply this to stocks? I'll give you two examples of CEO's (Who's) that I've invested in and one that I got wrong by realizing it too late, and one that I got right by realizing it early. Before I get in to them though, I want to clarify one point about this lesson. This is identifying WHO is a good CEO/partner/friend, that should lead to a good investment. This is NOT identifying who is a good PERSON. I think Steve Jobs was a horrible person and incredibly unethical. I think he was a ruthless thief...but damn was he an incredible CEO. Case #1: Elon Musk and Tesla When I first started reading about Elon, something seemed off about him. I thought he was selling BS and I didn't want any part of it. I completely missed Tesla because of that. It wasn't until around 2017/18 that my mind started to change about him. He was being heavily shorted and he made some comment about putting a bed in that Tesla factory until he got production to where he wanted. That got my attention and so I started paying attention more to WHO he was. I know this is Reddit and most people hate him on here, but all I saw after that was someone who would stop at nothing to execute on his vision. I probably should have made a more serious investment in Tesla back in 19/20, but I thought I missed the boat. Luckily, I was able to get in Space X about a year and a half ago. I personally think Space X will explode out of the gates (they just signed a $12 Billion compute deal with Google a day or two ago), but I plan to hold long term. Love him or hate him - I think he will go down as one of the greatest operators in history and executes on plan unlike anything I have ever seen. Case #2: Nasrat Hakim and Elite Pharmaceuticals I was working on a client's deal who was heavily invested in ELTP and his shares were around 25 or 26 cents a share back in 2017. I looked at the company and it was just a hot mess. A bunch of hopium around a technology that introduced an agitant to pharmaceuticals that would burn your nose and throat if you tried to crush them while using them to get high. The technology was a good IDEA, but it didn't get FDA approval and they had almost no revenue (I think it was sub $1 million at the time.) The client didn't take the advice and I would just look at it every few months as it dropped from 25 to 20 and eventually all the way down to 3 cents. Then something amazing happened - ELTP started growing revenue and I believe they became cash flow positive around 2020 or 2021. You never really see that from a company that looks like it is on the verge of bankruptcy - especially a company on the OTC. I started reading everything I could on the C-suite. Nasrat impressed the hell out of me. An attorney first and then CEO, he made some incredibly shrewd decisions. He pulled out of all opioids during the massive litigation that was starting around the country against Purdue and other opioid companies. He changed the direction of the company from an "all or nothing" moonshot, to safe and steady generic manufacturer. Then he started negotiating deals, getting shareholders access to larger and larger revenue producing drugs. Lannet Pharma was once a $3 billion market value client of Elite's (and a hopeful buyout partner), was making a move to cut Elite out of the manufacturing side of their deal. Nasrat pivoted and hired Kirko Kirkov to develop an internal sales team. Kirkov was a brilliant acquisition. Kirkov sold more in 1 month than Lannett sold for Elite in a whole year. In another brilliant move, Nasrat sold off 3 drugs to a competitor for some much needed cash, but, at the time, no one knew the details of that full agreement. Nasrat had put a buyback clause in the agreement for the same price Elite was paid, but since he bought it back after the massive inflation post Covid, he essentially was able to buy all the drugs back for around a 25% discount. Due to all of these factors, I really believed in the "Who", and I started acquiring a massive amount of shares. This time, I was proud to have assessed the "Who" so early that I was able to buy shares at the 3 to 7 cent mark. I did have one MAJOR concern though, and it was a big one. The CFO, Carter Ward. My fear when investing in stocks as opposed to real estate deals is that I can never be 100% sure someone isn't cooking the books. This was a tiny company in a lot of trouble, and Carter left the company. That made me very concerned that what if the reason he left was because there was something he didn't like in the books? I've been in a similar situation myself during a stint as a CFO and I know from that experience that when something doesn't look good in the books, it is NOT a good feel and your goal is to get as far away as possible from problematic books. So, as Elite was going through various CFOs in the aftermath, it was making me feel worse and worse. The golden lining was the final moment for me that made me feel great about my investment. Carter Ward came back to ELTP. No CFO would come back to books that had problems in them. It was actually a better sign than if he had just stayed. Elite has a major date coming up on June 11th where the judge is pushing for an outcome on a patent dispute between ELTP and Purdue. The judge told Purdue to either work out an agreement or he would recommend Elite to file for dismissal, which I read as, "Games over. Figure it out or I'm dropping the case because Purdue doesn't even exist anymore." Closely following that date, ELTP has their annual earnings which will guaranteed be another record breaking year (they broke the record at the 9 month mark already). Top it off with the filing last week of a $26 Billion drug, which, by the estimates of one of the biggest cynics on this board, would be an approximate increase of revenues of about $600 million and ELTP is sitting pretty for an eventual buyout (they hired Jeffries about 10 months ago for M&A) or an uplisting/Spac merger. TLDR: Who you invest in matters more than what and I'm high on both Space X and ELTP and for those who haven't seen any of my prior posts, I am heavily invested in both. Long read, but hope it helps give some of you a perspective that I think is extremely important when putting your money in anything. </div>

Saturday, June 6, 2026

https://ift.tt/E1heQqD via /r/socialism https://ift.tt/F5rH1sK<hr> https://ift.tt/E1heQqD

Friday, June 5, 2026

https://ift.tt/2lIG8jJ via /r/NYPOSTauto https://ift.tt/BC3iy7j<hr> https://ift.tt/2lIG8jJ

Thursday, June 4, 2026

It is a sexual disorder rebellion against biology and the social function and role that men and women have. It attacks sexual expression by claiming it is a gender that is subjective.Men are not women, women are not men. No child has two moms or two dads.I am not a conservative but I am against the sexualization of everything or everyone and the sexual disorder that threatens the integrity of society.Men shouldn't be competing with women on femininity, they will lose every time.Women should not seek to be masculine.If I was given a choice to be a woman or a man by God as a man I probably would want to be a woman but I am not and I don't even want to try to change.I accept who God made me and what reality is. I am a man and I appreciate women but I stay in my lane and I don't want to be feminine because that doesn't belong to me to be.I don't even like everything women like anyways.Thank God I didn't make this choice because I would have chosen wrong.I was always meant to be a man.How hard is it to just be your true self?And same sex relationships aren't sane. Men and women are what is required for a proper marriage.I don't hate anyone who is non conforming but I don't want this to be normalized.None of this is about religion. This is about biology and sociology. Society can't function properly if men and women don't stay true to themselves and start to become homogenous and indifferent to each other.Religion only strengthens the case biology and sociology make.Unfortunately we can't trust academia to be honest with us but if we have real academic freedom there is no way that we can't conclude that conformity is superior to non-conformity.Biologically, sociologically, philosophically and of course theologically.None of the LGBTQ+ acronyms have a place in a perfect society or the religion that perfects a person.I know this post will face backlash but it's 2026, Trump got elected because of this and Elon Musk owns X.The censorship industrial complex is dead so let's not revive it or pretend it still has any function.This isn't 2010 anymore where we all pretended to hide our disapproval of liberal ideologies even though we still spread them anonymously If this post gets censored I'll just post it somewhere else but I shouldn't have to do that because this is a Christian forum so my message should be well received. via /r/Christianity https://ift.tt/Di9PYVO<hr> <div class="md">It is a sexual disorder rebellion against biology and the social function and role that men and women have. It attacks sexual expression by claiming it is a gender that is subjective. Men are not women, women are not men. No child has two moms or two dads. I am not a conservative but I am against the sexualization of everything or everyone and the sexual disorder that threatens the integrity of society. Men shouldn't be competing with women on femininity, they will lose every time. Women should not seek to be masculine. If I was given a choice to be a woman or a man by God as a man I probably would want to be a woman but I am not and I don't even want to try to change. I accept who God made me and what reality is. I am a man and I appreciate women but I stay in my lane and I don't want to be feminine because that doesn't belong to me to be. I don't even like everything women like anyways. Thank God I didn't make this choice because I would have chosen wrong. I was always meant to be a man. How hard is it to just be your true self? And same sex relationships aren't sane. Men and women are what is required for a proper marriage. I don't hate anyone who is non conforming but I don't want this to be normalized. None of this is about religion. This is about biology and sociology. Society can't function properly if men and women don't stay true to themselves and start to become homogenous and indifferent to each other. Religion only strengthens the case biology and sociology make. Unfortunately we can't trust academia to be honest with us but if we have real academic freedom there is no way that we can't conclude that conformity is superior to non-conformity. Biologically, sociologically, philosophically and of course theologically. None of the LGBTQ+ acronyms have a place in a perfect society or the religion that perfects a person. I know this post will face backlash but it's 2026, Trump got elected because of this and Elon Musk owns X. The censorship industrial complex is dead so let's not revive it or pretend it still has any function. This isn't 2010 anymore where we all pretended to hide our disapproval of liberal ideologies even though we still spread them anonymously If this post gets censored I'll just post it somewhere else but I shouldn't have to do that because this is a Christian forum so my message should be well received. </div>

Wednesday, June 3, 2026

https://ift.tt/gaTzvYx via /r/Austin https://ift.tt/T63BpKu<hr> https://ift.tt/gaTzvYx

Tuesday, June 2, 2026

https://ift.tt/XbzRNfK via /r/WhitePeopleTwitter https://ift.tt/hUmDwep<hr> https://ift.tt/XbzRNfK

Monday, June 1, 2026

https://ift.tt/JiCwzcx via /r/Inauthentic_Behavior https://ift.tt/Y4cv3BA<hr> <div class="md"><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/may/28/still-on-x-ask-yourself-why-platform-twitter-malign-actors-misinformation?CMP=share_btn_url">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/may/28/still-on-x-ask-yourself-why-platform-twitter-malign-actors-misinformation?CMP=share_btn_url</a> </div>

https://ift.tt/zQX6qdI via /r/RealityChecksReddit https://ift.tt/vbSwzke<hr> https://ift.tt/zQX6qdI

Translate